The Games Industry as 21st Century Imperialism & Its Cultivation of Fascism

Emil Lundedal Hammar / UiT-The Arctic University of Norway - The videogame industry is emblematic of what John Smith (2016) terms 21st century imperialism, where rich countries and multinational companies profit from ‘super-exploitation’ (Smith 2018) of the so-called Global South via global production chains. These relations of production result in repeated crises that in turn exacerbate violent, reactionary movements usually found in fascist tidings stemming from the inherent crises in capitalism (Traverso 2019; Jong 2020).

Like other mass-cultural forms, videogames are produced within and are enabled by a historical and material global network reliant on global capitalism (Dyer-Witheford and De Peuter 2009; Kirkpatrick 2013: 108). This is achieved via postcolonial access to slave labour extracting conflict minerals in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Sinclair 2015, 2016, 2017; Valentine 2018); the super-exploitation of countries like China, India, Vietnam, and Malaysia (Fuchs 2017, Qiu 2017); the free-trade regulations of the centres of economic power; the precarious working conditions of software developers in North America (Consalvo 2008, O’Donnell 2014, Williams 2013) and in cheaply outsourced countries like Malaysia and Vietnam (Flecker 2016, Thomsen 2018); the exploitation of passion via ‘playbour’ by multibillion-dollar software companies (Dyer- Witheford and De Peuter 2009; Bulut 2020); the dominance of white heterosexual masculinity in game studios and the industry writ large (Srauy 2019; Johnson.

In 2018; Bulut 2020); and the disposal of e-waste back into the exploited countries (Maxwell et al. 2014, Nguyen 2017), that digital games are able to flourish as a cultural and economic force for those consumers with access to them (Huntemann and Aslinger 2012).

The consolidation of power by software and hardware platforms also affirm a ‘platformisation of culture’ (Nieborg and Poell 2018), whereby markets are structured in the interests of a single dominant platform holder, such as Apple, Amazon, Google, Sony, Microsoft or Valve, that facilitates ‘platform imperialism’ (Jin 2015; D. B. Nieborg, Young, and Joseph 2020). While the games industry has been at the forefront of many of these changes, I argue that its contemporary form is predicated on twenty- first century imperialism and their products are symptoms of the historical and materialist systems they derive from. The games industry follows monopoly capitalist production networks (Baran and Sweezy 1966) that super-exploit workers and the environment in the imperial periphery, while circulating surplus profits towards the -- 2 -- core. The prominent games themselves often reflect this global stratification via a dominance of white, male, heterosexual Anglophone subjugating others (Fron et al. 2007). This means that both game development and the games themselves reflect each other. Hence, as Joseph (2018b) argues: ‘if you look at video games, capitalism stares back at you. They idealise experiences of individual freedom (through code or play), while exploiting uneven global development’. This is the primary mode of argumentation that leads me to argue that the conditions of capitalism and their inherent tendency to produce crises; the global stratification between imperial core and periphery; and the Western white masculine dominance in the games themselves result in reactionary behaviour by consumers that lash out at any perceived and constructed outsiders, usually seen in the many examples of white supremacy (Gray 2014; Russworm 2018), heteronormative patriarchy (Shaw 2018; 2015), and postcolonial dynamics (Mukherjee 2017) between social groups in games culture, both within the imperial core and against their periphery (Jong 2020). Ultimately, because the 21st century imperialism of the games industry operates across chauvinistic stratification (cf. Cope 2015) the games industry and the products it produces cultivate fascist logics, as also evidenced in the numerous harassment campaigns against players and workers in and around games (A. Salter and Blodgett 2012; M. Salter 2017; Mortensen 2018; Massanari 2017; Polansky 2018). As such, my argument breaks new ground by linking the white supremacist, heteronormative masculinity usually researched in games culture (Taylor and Voorhees 2018) with materialist analysis from Marxist theories on imperialism and whiteness (Du Bois 1935; Cope 2015). Thus, I locate the materialist underpinnings of reactionary elements in digital game culture and their relation to the games industry. As such, the paper combines questions of political economy, imperialism, critical race theory, and feminism that ultimately makes a case for the relation between materialist production and reactionary movements. This allows us to more easily account for and identify the inherent tendency for the games industry to cultivate and give rise to fascism.



  • Baran, Paul, and Paul Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capitalism. New York, United States: Monthly Review Press.
  • Bulut, Ergin. 2020. A Precarious Game: The Illusion of Dream Jobs in the Video Game Industry. Ithaca: ILR Press.
  • Consalvo, Mia. 2008. “Crunched by Passion: Women Game Developers andWorkplace Challenges.” In Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming, 177–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cope, Zak. 2015. Divided World, Divided Class. Second edition. Montreal, Quebec: Kersplebedeb.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. 1935. Black Reconstruction in America: Toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860-1880. 1 edition. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
  • Dyer-Witheford, Nick, and Greig De Peuter. 2009. Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minnesota / London: Minnesota Press.
  • Flecker, Jorg, ed. 2016. Space, Place and Global Digital Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Fron, Janine, Tracy Fullerton, Jacquelyn Ford Morie, and Celia Pearce. 2007. “The Hegemony of Play.” In Situated Play. Tokyo.
  • Fuchs, Christian. 2017. “Capitalism, Patriarchy, Slavery, and Racism in the Age of Digital Capitalism and Digital Labour.” Critical Sociology, February, 0896920517691108.
  • Gray, Kishonna Leah. 2014. Race, Gender, and Deviance in Xbox Live: Theoretical Perspectives from the Virtual Margins. Waltham / Oxford: Elsevier.Huntemann, Nina B., and Ben Aslinger, eds. 2012.
  • Gaming Globally: Production, Play, and Place. 2013th ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US.
  • Jin, Dal Yong. 2015. Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. New York / London: Routledge.
  • Johnson, Robin. 2018. “Technomasculinity and Its Influence in Video Game Production.” In Masculinities in Play, 249–262. Champaigne, IL: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jong, Carolyn. 2020. “Bringing Politics Into It: Organizing at the Intersection of Videogames and Academia.” Montreal, Canada: Concordia University.
  • Joseph, Daniel. 2018. “Code of Conduct.” Real Life Magazine, April 12, 2018.
  • Kirkpatrick, Graeme. 2013. Computer Games and the Social Imaginary. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Massanari, Adrienne. 2017. “#Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures.” New Media & Society 19 (3): 329–46.
  • Maxwell, Richard, Jon Raundalen, and Nina Lager Vestberg. 2014. Media and the Ecological Crisis. New York / London: Routledge. Mortensen, Torill Elvira. 2018. “Anger, Fear, and Games: The Long Event of #GamerGate.” Games and Culture 13 (8): 787–806.
  • Mukherjee, Souvik. 2017. Videogames and Postcolonialism: Empire Plays Back. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nguyen, Josef. 2017. “Digital Games about the Materiality of Digital Games.”
  • Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment 8 (2): 18–38.
  • Nieborg, David B., Chris J. Young, and Daniel Joseph. 2020. “App Imperialism: The Political Economy of the Canadian App Store.” Social Media + Society 6 (2).
  • Nieborg, David, and Thomas Poell. 2018. “The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity.” New Media & Society, April, 1461444818769694.
  • O’Donnell, Casey. 2014. Developer’s Dilemma: The Secret World of Videogame Creators. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
  • Polansky, Lana. 2018. “Worse than Scabs: Gamer Rage as Anti-Union Violence.”
  • Rhizome, October 30, 2018.
  • Qiu, Jack Linchuan. 2017. Goodbye ISlave: A Manifesto for Digital Abolition. Champaigne, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Russworm, TreaAndrea M. 2018. “A Call to Action for Video Game Studies in an Age of Reanimated White Supremacy.” The Velvet Light Trap 81 (1): 73–76.
  • Salter, Anastasia, and Bridget Blodgett. 2012. “Hypermasculinity & Dickwolves: The Contentious Role of Women in the New Gaming Public.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56 (3): 401–16.
  • Salter, Michael. 2017. “From Geek Masculinity to Gamergate: The Technological Rationality of Online Abuse.” Crime, Media, Culture, February, 1741659017690893.
  • Shaw, Adrienne. 2015. Gaming at the Edge: Sexuality and Gender at the Margins of Gamer Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • ———. 2018. “Are We There Yet?: The Politics and Practice of Intersectional Game Studies.” The Velvet Light Trap 81: 76–80.
  • Sinclair, Brendan. 2015. “Conflict Minerals the Real Link between Games and Violence.” GamesIndustry.Biz. June 3, 2015.
  • ———. 2016. “Conflict Mineral Sourcing Still Hazy for Games Industry.” GamesIndustry.Biz. June 7, 2016.
  • ———. 2017. “Conflict Minerals Progress in Jeopardy.” GamesIndustry.Biz. June 5, 2017.
  • Smith, John. 2016. Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • ———. 2018. “Exploitation and Super-Exploitation.” Monthly Review (blog). April 14, 2018.
  • Srauy, Sam. 2019. “Professional Norms and Race in the North American Video Game Industry.” Games and Culture 14 (5): 478–97.
  • Taylor, Nicholas, and Gerald Voorhees. 2018. “Introduction: Masculinity and Gaming: Mediated Masculinities in Play.” In Masculinities in Play, edited by Nicholas
  • Taylor and Gerald Voorhees, 1–19. Palgrave Games in Context. Champaigne, IL: Springer International Publishing.
  • Thomsen, Michael. 2018. “Made in China: Every New Video Game You Love.” The Outline, February 6, 2018.
  • Traverso, Enzo. 2019. The New Faces of Fascism: Populism and the Far Right.
  • Translated by David Broder. London and New York: Verso Books.
  • Valentine, Rebekah. 2018. “Which Game Companies Could Be Using Slave Labor?” GamesIndustry.Biz. June 27, 2018.
  • Williams, Ian. 2013. “‘You Can Sleep Here All Night’: Video Games and Labor.”
  • Jacobin. August 11, 2013.

 Please consider becoming a $10 per month supporter of The National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth
And our work to demilitarize our schools and youth.
Donate Here


Subscribe to NNOMY Newsletter

NNOMYnews reports on the growing intrusions by the Department of Defense into our public schools in a campaign to normalize perpetual wars with our youth and to promote the recruitment efforts of the Pentagon.


Search Articles



This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues connected with militarism and resistance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Donate to NNOMY

Your donation to NNOMY works to balance the military's message in our public schools. Our national network of activists go into schools and inform youth considering military service the risks about military service that recruiters leave out.